Disposição a pagar e Método de Valoração Contingente na avaliação econômica de serviços farmacêuticos / Willingness to pay and Contingent Valuation Method in the economic evaluation of pharmacy services

Objetivo: Sintetizar os principais pontos abordados em investigações de Disposição a Pagar (DAP) por serviços farmacêuticos, com foco no Método de Valoração Contingente (MVC). Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão não sistemática com recuperação e análise de manuscritos publicados até novembro de 2020. A busca por estudos ocorreu nas bases MEDLINE, LILACS e SciELO. Resultados: Foram discutidos os fundamentos teóricos e processos metodológicos da análise, apresentando o MVC como principal perspectiva de abordagem. Enquanto delineamento do questionário, é sugerida uma estrutura que apresente, sequencialmente, os elementos: "conhecimento do participante sobre a intervenção", "apresentação da intervenção", "cenário hipotético", "pergunta DAP", "estado de saúde percebido" e "informações socioeconômicas". No mais, é enfatizada a importância da execução de etapas de validação, tanto do instrumento quanto da avaliação. Conclusão: Avaliar a preferência declarada da população por serviços farmacêuticos é uma estratégia ainda limitada. Se realizado adequadamente, esse tipo de investigação pode auxiliar gestores e tomadores de decisão no processo de implementação de novas tecnologias de cuidado.

Objective: To synthesize key points addressed in investigations of Willingness to Pay (WTP) for pharmaceutical care services, focusing on the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). Methods: We performed a non-systematic review with recovery and analysis of manuscript published until November 2020. Three databases were majorly searched, including MEDLINE, LILACS and SciELO. Results: The theoretical foundations and methodological process were discussed, presenting the CVM as the main perspective. For questionnaire design, is suggested a structure that sequentially presents the elements: "participant knowledge on intervention", "intervention presentation", "hypothetical scenario", "WTP question", "perceived health status", and "socioeconomic information". In addition, we emphasize the importance of executing validation steps for the instrument of measurement as well as the evaluation process. Conclusion: Assessing the population's declared preference for pharmaceutical services is still a limited strategy. If carried out properly, this type of investigation can help managers and decision makers in the process of implementing technologies of care.

Comparative analysis of kidney transplant costs related to recovery of renal function after the procedure / Análise comparativa dos custos do transplante renal relacionados à recuperação da função renal após o procedimento

Abstract Introduction: The number of kidney transplants (KTx) is increasing in Brazil and, consequently, the costs of this procedure increase the country's health budget. We retrospectively evaluated the data of kidney transplant procedures until hospital discharge, according to kidney function recovery after the procedure. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the non-sensitized, 1st KTx from deceased donors performed between Jan/2010 to Dec/2017. Results: Out of the 1300 KTx from deceased donors performed in this period, 730 patients were studied and divided into 3 groups: Immediate Renal Function (IRF) - decrease in serum creatinine ≥ 10% on two consecutive days; Delayed Graft Function (DGF) - decrease in serum creatinine <10% on two consecutive days, without the need for dialysis, and Dialysis (D) - need for dialysis during the first week. Patients in group D stayed longer in the hospital compared to DGF and IRF (21, 11 and 8 days respectively, p < 0.001). More D patients (21%) were admitted to the ICU and performed a greater number of laboratory tests (p < 0.001) and renal biopsies (p < 0.001), in addition to receiving a higher amount of immunosuppressants. Total hospital costs were higher in group D and DGF compared to IRF (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 and U$ 2.642,37 respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The costs of the transplant procedure is impacted by the recovery of kidney function after the transplant. The reimbursement for each of these different kidney function outcomes should be individualized in order to cover their real costs.

Resumo Introdução: O número de transplantes renais (KTx, do inglês kidney transplant) está aumentando no Brasil e, consequentemente, os custos deste procedimento aumentam o orçamento de saúde do país. Avaliamos retrospectivamente dados dos procedimentos de transplantes renais até a alta hospitalar, de acordo com a recuperação da função renal após o procedimento. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva dos 1º KTx de doadores falecidos, não sensibilizados, realizados entre Jan/2010 a Dez/2017. Resultados: Dos 1300 KTx de doadores falecidos realizados neste período, 730 pacientes foram estudados e divididos em 3 grupos: Função Renal Imediata (FRI) - diminuição na creatinina sérica ≥ 10% em dois dias consecutivos; Função Retardada do Enxerto (FRE) - diminuição na creatinina sérica <10% em dois dias consecutivos, sem necessidade de diálise, e Diálise (D) - necessidade de diálise durante a primeira semana. Pacientes no grupo D permaneceram mais tempo no hospital em comparação com FRE e FRI (21, 11 e 8 dias dias respectivamente, p < 0,001). Mais pacientes do grupo D (21%) foram admitidos na UTI e realizaram um maior número de testes laboratoriais (p < 0,001) e biópsias renais (p < 0,001), além de receberem uma quantidade maior de imunossupressores. Os custos hospitalares totais foram mais elevados nos grupos D e FRE em comparação com FRI (U$ 7.021,48; U$ 3.603,42 e U$ 2.642,37 respectivamente, p < 0,001). Conclusão: Os custos do procedimento de transplante são impactados pela recuperação da função renal após o transplante. O reembolso para cada um desses diferentes desfechos da função renal deve ser individualizado a fim de cobrir seus custos reais.

Pharmaceutical procurement among public sector procurers in CARICOM / Compras farmacéuticas por parte de organismos del sector público de CARICOM / Aquisição de produtos farmacêuticos por compradores do setor público da CARICOM

ABSTRACT Objective. To examine multiple aspects of the medicines in CARICOM procurement markets, including manufacturer headquarters location, regulatory history, and type (innovator versus generic); the proportion of World Health Organization (WHO) essential medicines; and the most expensive medicines procured. Methods. An analysis of procurement information from selected CARICOM procurers. Four public sector procurement lists were obtained based on public availability or sharing of data from public sector procurers. Analyses were based on parameters available or deduced from these data. Results. The majority of products come from manufacturers headquartered in North America and Europe (63%-67%). The percentage of medicines procured from generic companies is 60%-87%; and 25%-50% of medicines procured are on the WHO Essential Medicines List. Wide price variations exist in the most expensive medicines purchased. Conclusions. The analysis identifies vulnerabilities and opportunities in the procurement situation of CARICOM states, particularly related to quality and rational use of medicines. This analysis represents a baseline that governments and other stakeholders can use in the future.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Revisar los múltiples aspectos de los medicamentos en los mercados de compras y los proveedores de CARICOM, como la ubicación de la sede del fabricante, el historial de regulación, el tipo (patentado versus genérico); la proporción de medicamentos esenciales de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS); y los medicamentos comprados más caros. Métodos. Se analizó información sobre la compra por parte de determinados organismos de CARICOM. La información procedía de cuatro listas de organismos del sector público que realizan las compras, que se consiguieron en función de su disponibilidad pública o de los datos distribuidos por los organismos del sector público que realizan las compras. Los análisis estaban basados en los parámetros disponibles o derivados de estos datos. Resultados. La mayoría de los productos proviene de fabricantes radicados en América del Norte y Europa (entre 63% y 67%). El porcentaje de medicamentos que se compra de empresas genéricas oscila entre 60% y 87%; y de 25% a 50% de los medicamentos que se compran están en la Lista de Medicamentos Esenciales de la OMS. Hay una gran divergencia de precios entre los medicamentos comprados más caros. Conclusiones. En el análisis se han encontrado vulnerabilidades y oportunidades con respecto a la situación de las compras de medicamentos de los Estados de CARICOM, especialmente en cuanto a la calidad y al uso racional de los medicamentos. Este análisis representa una línea de base que los gobiernos u otros interesados directos pueden utilizar en el futuro.

RESUMO Objetivo. Examinar vários aspectos relacionados aos mercados e fornecedores de produtos farmacêuticos da CARICOM, incluindo a localização da sede do laboratório fabricante, histórico regulatório e tipo de produtos (inovadores versus genéricos); proporção de medicamentos adquiridos que constam da relação de medicamentos essenciais da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS); e medicamentos mais caros comprados. Métodos. Foi realizada uma análise de informação sobre compras feitas por compradores selecionados da CARICOM. Quatro listas de compras do setor público foram obtidas com informação de acesso público ou compartilhada pelos compradores. As análises foram feitas com base em parâmetros disponíveis ou inferidos a partir dos dados. Resultados. A maioria dos produtos farmacêuticos é proveniente de laboratórios com sedes na América do Norte e Europa (63%-67%). Do total, 60%-87% dos medicamentos adquiridos são de laboratórios de produtos genéricos e 25%-50% constam da relação de medicamentos essenciais da OMS. Existe uma ampla variação nos preços dos medicamentos mais caros comprados. Conclusões. Foram identificadas fragilidades e oportunidades na situação de compras dos países da CARICOM, em particular relacionadas à qualidade dos produtos e ao uso racional dos medicamentos. Esta análise serve de referência a ser usada futuramente pelos governos e outras partes interessadas.

Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacist interventions over 36 months in a university hospital

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-benefits analysis of a clinical pharmacy (CP) service implemented in a Neurology ward of a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: This is a cost-benefit analysis of a single arm, prospective cohort study performed at the adult Neurology Unit over 36 months, which has evaluated the results of a CP service from a hospital and Public Health System (PHS) perspective. The interventions were classified into 14 categories and the costs identified as direct medical costs. The results were analyzed by the total and marginal cost, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and the net benefit (NB). RESULTS: The total 334 patients were followed-up and the highest occurrence in 506 interventions was drug introduction (29.0%). The marginal cost for the hospital and avoided cost for PHS was US$182±32 and US$25,536±4,923 per year; and US$0.55 and US$76.4 per patient/year. The BCR and NB were 0.0, -US$26,105 (95%CI −31,850 − -10,610), -US$27,112 (95%CI −33,160-11,720) for the hospital and; 3.0 (95%CI 1.97-4.94), US$51,048 (95%CI 27,645-75,716) and, 4.6 (95%CI 2.24-10.05), US$91,496 (95%CI 34,700-168,050; p < 0.001) for the PHS, both considering adhered and total interventions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CP service was not directly cost-benefit at the hospital perspective, but it presented savings for forecast cost related to the occurrence of preventable morbidities, measuring a good cost-benefit for the PHS.

Distinct models to assess the cost-effectiveness of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the context of the Brazilian Unified Health Care System / Diferentes modelos para avaliar a relação custo-efetividade de inibidores de tirosina quinase do EGFR no tratamento do câncer de pulmão não pequenas células metastático no contexto do Sistema Único de Saúde

ABSTRACT Objective: Lung cancer is an important health problem due to its high incidence and mortality. The treatment of metastatic disease improved after the molecular pathways of cancer came to be known. However, targeted therapy is unavailable to many patients treated within the Brazilian Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS, Unified Health Care System). Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib versus that of chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the context of the SUS. Methods: Different analytical models were developed based on data in the literature. The outcomes were presented in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. All costs related to treatment and supportive therapies were included in the models. Results: In one model, data from retrospective studies showed 2.01 life-years saved and a mean QALY gain of 1.169. The ICER per QALY gained ranged from R$48,451.29 (for gefitinib) to R$85,559.22 (for erlotinib). In another model, data from a meta-analysis showed −0.01 life-years saved and a mean QALY gain of 0.178. The ICER per QALY gained ranged from R$27,028.30 (for gefitinib) to R$75,203.26 (for erlotinib). Conclusions: There is no ideal analytical model for the SUS. However, targeted therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been shown to be cost-effective in various scenarios. The adoption of drug price discounts will improve the cost-effectiveness of treatment.

RESUMO Objetivo: O câncer de pulmão é um importante problema de saúde pela sua alta incidência e mortalidade. O tratamento da doença metastática melhorou após o conhecimento de vias moleculares tumorais. Contudo, a terapia-alvo está indisponível para muitos pacientes do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a relação custo-efetividade de erlotinibe, gefitinibe e afatinibe vs. quimioterapia no tratamento do câncer de pulmão não pequenas células no contexto do SUS. Métodos: Foram desenvolvidos modelos analíticos distintos baseados em dados da literatura. Os desfechos foram apresentados em quality-adjusted life years (QALY, anos de vida ajustados pela qualidade) e incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, relação custo-efetividade incremental). Todos os custos relacionados ao tratamento e terapias de suporte foram incluídos nos modelos. Resultados: No primeiro modelo, dados de estudos retrospectivos apontaram 2,01 anos de vida salvos e uma média de ganho de QALY de 1,169. O ICER variou entre R$ 48.451,29 (gefitinibe) e R$ 85.559,22 (erlotinibe). No segundo modelo, dados de uma meta-análise evidenciaram −0,01 ano de vida salvos e uma média de ganho de QALY de 0,178. O ICER foi de R$ 27.028,30 (gefitinibe) a R$ 75.203,26 (erlotinibe). Conclusões: Não existe um modelo analítico ideal para o SUS. Contudo, diferentes cenários disponíveis na literatura mostram que a terapia-alvo com o uso dessas drogas é custo-efetiva. A adoção de descontos nos preços dos medicamentos melhorará a relação custo-efetividade do tratamento.

Potential life years not saved due to lack of access to anti-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for lung cancer treatment in the Brazilian public healthcare system: Budget impact and strategies to improve access. A pharmacoeconomic study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Brazil. In the 2000s, better understanding of molecular pathways led to development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted treatments that have improved outcomes. However, these treatments are unavailable in most Brazilian public healthcare services (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential number of years of life not saved, the budget impact of the treatment and strategies to improve access. DESIGN AND SETTING: Pharmacoeconomic study assessing the potential societal and economic impact of adopting EGFR-targeted therapy within SUS. METHODS: We estimated the number of cases eligible for treatment, using epidemiological data from the National Cancer Institute. We used data from a single meta-analysis and from the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC) study as the basis for assessing differences in patients' survival between use of targeted therapy and use of chemotherapy. The costs of targeted treatment were based on the national reference and were compared with the amount reimbursed for chemotherapy through SUS. RESULTS: There was no life-year gain with EGFR-targeted therapy in the single meta-analysis (hazard ratio, HR, 1.01). The LCMC showed that 1,556 potential life-years were not saved annually. We estimated that the annual budget impact was 125 million Brazilian reais (BRL) with erlotinib, 48 million BRL with gefitinib and 52 million BRL with afatinib. Their incremental costs over chemotherapy per life-year saved were 80,329 BRL, 31,011 BRL and 33,225 BRL, respectively. A drug acquisition discount may decrease the budget impact by 30% (with a 20% discount). A fixed cost of 1,000 BRL may decrease the budget impact by 95%. CONCLUSION: Reducing drug acquisition costs may improve access to EGFR-targeted therapy for lung cancer.

Análise econômica do denosumabe e dos bisfosfonatos no tratamento de pacientes com metástase óssea / Economic analysis of denosumab and bisphosphonates for the treatment of patients with bone metastases

Introdução: Metástases ósseas são prevalentes em pacientes com câncer avançado e podem causar prejuízos significativos na qualidade de vida do doente. O tratamento consiste no controle da dor e na prevenção de Eventos Relacionados ao Esqueleto (ERE), complicações altamente limitantes e de impacto multidimensional. Na prevenção de ERE são utilizados bisfosfonatos e denosumabe, medicamentos de uso crônico e de alto custo, os quais requerem avaliações de custo-efetividade, sobretudo para auxiliar decisões que envolvem alocação de recursos públicos. Objetivo: Realizar análise econômica de medicamentos alvo-específicos usados no tratamento de pacientes com metástases ósseas. Método: Trata-se de uma Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde (ATS) em que se realizou Análise de Custo-Efetividade (ACE) e de impacto orçamentário (AIO), sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde, com horizonte temporal de dois anos. Os dados relativos a custos foram provenientes de bases de dados nacionais. Informações relativas à efetividade, medida pela proporção de pacientes livres de ERE derivou-se de revisões sistemáticas. Na ACE, desenvolveram-se dois modelos de Markov, a saber: pacientes com câncer de mama, cujo tratamento foi baseado no uso de denosumabe, ácido zoledrônico ou pamidronato; e para Outros Tumores Sólidos (OTS), baseado no uso de denosumabe ou ácido zoledrônico. Nestes modelos, considerou-se quatro estados de saúde (com/sem ERE, novo ERE e morte). Resultados foram expressos em Razão de Custo- Efetividade Incremental (RCEI) e as incertezas foram testadas em análise de sensibilidade determinística e probabilística. Realizou-se AIO em cinco anos, considerando-se diferentes cenários de uso das terapias. Resultados: Na modelagem de Markov para mama, evidenciou-se que o pamidronato foi o tratamento mais custo-efetivo. As RCEI do ácido zoledrônico e do denosumabe em relação ao pamidronato foram, respectivamente, de R$ 5.935,60 e R$ 17.929,09 por ERE evitado. No modelo para OTS, a estratégia custo-efetiva foi o ácido zoledrônico. A RCEI do denosumabe em relação ao ácido zoledrônico foi de R$ 26.061,90 por ERE evitada. Em análise de sensibilidade, os resultados inicialmente encontrados foram mantidos, o que indica a robustez das análises. Na AIO, independentemente do tipo de tumor, o uso do ácido zoledrônico representou o cenário menos oneroso, em cinco anos. Conclusões: Para o Brasil, as ACE apontaram que o medicamento custo- efetivo para o tratamento de metástases ósseas no câncer de mama foi o pamidronato e para OTS foi o ácido zoledrônico. A incorporação do denosumabe resultaria em aumento substancial nos custos do tratamento, especialmente em longo prazo. Entretanto, para a tomada de decisão, devem-se considerar fatores para além de efetividade, segurança e custos, como aceitabilidade, valores e preferências dos pacientes, viabilidade e equidade.

Introduction: Bone metastases are prevalent among patients with advanced cancer and may result in significant decrease in quality of life. Its treatment consists of pain alleviation and prevention of Skeletal Related Events (SRE), highly debilitating complications with multidimensional impact. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the treatment of choice to prevent SRE. Both are high cost medications of chronic use, which requires cost effectiveness analyses to support decision making in resource allocation. Objectives: To conduct an economic analysis of bone-targeted agents for the treatment of bone metastases secondary to solid tumors. Methods: A Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) was performed from the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System, over a 2-year time horizon. Data were collected from different sources and included national databases for different categories of costs, and scientific articles for effectiveness, measured by the proportion of SRE-free patients. The CEA was based on two Markov models: For patients with breast cancer, in which the treatment was based on denosumab, zoledronic acid or pamidronate; and for Other Solid Tumors (OST), based on the use of denosumab and zoledronic acid. In these models, four health states (with/without SRE, new SRE, and death), and their transition probabilities were considered. Results were expressed by means of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER), and the uncertainties were tested in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A BIA in five years was conducted considering different scenarios. Results: In the Markov model for breast cancer, pamidronate was the cost-effective strategy. In the zoledronic acid/pamidronate and denosumab/pamidronate comparisons, ICERs of R$ 5,935.70 and R$ 17,929.09 per SRE avoided were observed. In the OST model, zoledronic acid was the cost-effective strategy, and the ICER of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid was R$ 26,061.44 per SRE avoided. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model, as results remained unchanged. In the BIA, regardless of tumor type, the least costly scenario in five years was the one in which all patients received zoledronic acid. Conclusion: Considering the Brazilian healthcare setting, the CEA showed that pamidronate for breast cancer and zoledronic acid for OST were the cost-effective strategies. Denosumab coverage would result in substantial increase in treatment costs. However, in the decision-making process, factors beyond effectiveness, safety and costs should be considered, for example, acceptability, patients values and preferences, feasibility and equity.

Impacto económico institucional del programa Receta Resurtible con pacientes diabéticos / Institutional economic impact of the Receta Resurtible (Resupply Prescription) program in diabetic patients

Objetivo: determinar el impacto económico institucional del programa Receta Resurtible con pacientes diabéticos. Material y métodos: estudio de costos antes y después del programa Receta Resurtible con pacientes diabéticos. El costo promedio incluyó perfil de uso y costo unitario. El perfil de uso se determinó para Consulta externa, Farmacia y medicamentos. En el análisis se plantearon escenarios y se adoptaron supuestos. Resultados: el promedio de consultas antes y después se ubica en 6.45 y 4.73, respectivamente. La dotación de medicamentos fue 55.8% y 99%. El impacto del programa para una unidad de medicina familiar con 6400 pacientes diabéticos, de los cuales 18% se encuentra en el programa Receta Resurtible, permite un ahorro de $ 490 366 en la consulta de Medicina familiar y atención en Farmacia, sin embargo existe un incremento de $112 100 por consumo de medicamentos, el ahorro total en este escenario es de $378 266. Conclusión: el impacto económico del programa Receta Resurtible es benéfico para la institución.

Objective: To determine the institutional economic impact of the Resupply Prescription program in diabetic patients. Material and methods: Study of costs before and after the Resupply Prescription program with diabetic patients. The average cost included usage profile and unit cost. The profile of use was determined for External consultation, Pharmacy and medication. In the analysis, scenarios were raised and assumptions were adopted. Results: The average of before and after consultations is located at 6.45 and 4.73, respectively. The medication provision was 55.8 and 99%. The impact of the program for a Family Medicine Unit with 6400 diabetic patients, of which 18% is in the Resupply Prescription program, allows a saving of $ 490 366 in the consultation of Family Medicine and Pharmacy, however there is a increase of $ 112 100 for drug consumption, the total saving in this scenario is $ 378 266. Conclusion: The economic impact of the Resupply Prescription program is beneficial for the institution.

Patient safety and the value of pharmaceutical intervention in a cancer hospital / Segurança do paciente e o valor da intervenção farmacêutica em um hospital oncológico

ABSTRACT Objective To demonstrate economic impact of pharmaceutical evaluation in detection and prevention of errors in antineoplastic prescriptions. Methods This was an observational and retrospective study performed in a cancer hospital. From July to August 2016 pharmacists checked prescriptions of antineoplastic and adjuvant drugs. Drug-related problems observed were classified and analyzed concerning drug, pharmaceutical intervention, acceptability and characteristic of the error. In case of problem related to dose, we calculated a deviation percentage related with correct dose and value spent or saved. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with frequency and percentage. Results A total of 6,104 prescriptions and 12,128 medications were evaluated. Drug-related problems were identified in 274 (4.5%) prescriptions. Most of them was due to lack of information (n=117; 36.1%). Problems associated with dose accounted for 32.1% (n=98) of the total. In 13 cases (13.3%) ranging of prescribed dose was 50% greater than the correct dose. Intercepted drug-related problems provided savings of R$54.081,01 and expenses of R$20.863,36, therefore resulting in a positive balance of R$33.217,65. Each intervention promoted saving of R$126,78 with an acceptance rate of 98%. Main pharmaceutical interventions were information inclusion (n=117; 36.1%) and dose change (n=97; 29.9%). All errors were classified as error with no harm. Conclusion Simple actions such as prescription checking are able to identify and prevent drug-related problems, avoid financial losses and add immeasurable value to patient safety.

RESUMO Objetivo Demonstrar o impacto econômico da avaliação farmacêutica na detecção e na prevenção de erros em prescrições de antineoplásicos. Métodos Estudo observacional e retrospectivo realizado em um hospital oncológico. De julho a agosto de 2016, prescrições contendo antineoplásicos e fármacos adjuvantes ao tratamento foram avaliadas por farmacêuticos. Os problemas detectados relacionados a medicamentos foram classificados e analisados quanto ao medicamento, à intervenção farmacêutica, à aceitabilidade e à caracterização do erro. Quando o problema envolveu dose, calcularam-se a percentagem de desvio em relação à dose correta e o valor gasto ou economizado. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva com aplicação de frequência e percentual. Resultados Foram avaliadas 6.104 prescrições e 12.128 medicamentos. Identificaram-se problemas relacionados a medicamentos em 274 (4,5%) prescrições, sendo a maioria causado por falta de informações (n=117; 36,1%). Quando reunidos, os problemas envolvendo dose representaram 32,1% (n=98) do total. Em 13 casos (13,3%), a variação da dose prescrita em relação à correta foi maior do que 50%. Os problemas relacionados a medicamentos interceptados representaram economia de R$54.081,01 e gastos de R$20.863,36, resultando em saldo positivo de R$33.217,65. Cada intervenção promoveu economia de R$126,78 com aceitabilidade de 98%. As principais intervenções foram inclusão de informações (n=117; 36,1%) e alteração de dose (n=97; 29,9%). Todos os erros foram considerados sem dano. Conclusão Ações simples de serem implantadas, como análise de prescrições, são capazes de identificar e prevenir problemas relacionados a medicamentos, evitar perdas financeiras e agregar imensurável valor na segurança do paciente.

Efficacy and economic evaluation of sequential levofloxacin therapy in elderly patients with acute pneumonia / 中国基层医药

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomicvalue of levofloxacin in the treatment of acute pneumonia.Methods From March 2015 to March 2016,120 elderly patients with acute pneumonia in Xishan Coal Worker General Hospital were selected as the research objects,and they were randomly divided into A,B,C three groups according to the envelope method,with 40 cases in each group.A group took levofloxacin injection intravenous oral sequential-levofloxacin tablets.B group took the levofloxacin Injection continuous intravenous infusion therapy.C group took moxifloxacin sodium chloride injection continuous intravenous infusion treatment effect of the three groups were compared the clinical efficacy and cost ratio.Results There was no statistically significant difference in treatment course among the three groups (P ＞ 0.05);The total effective rate of A,B,C three groups was 82.50％,82.50％,80.00％,respectively,there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups (x2 =0.2133,P ＞ 0.05);The cost effectiveness ratio of A group was 11.21,which in B group was 17.31,which in C group was 33.65,the cost effectiveness ratio of A group was significantly better than that of B group and C group (x2 =5.235,5.982,all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The sequential treatment with levofloxacin injection can achieve good curative effect and lower economic cost for elderly patients with acute pneumonia.

Cost effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer / Custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia ao tratamento hormonal do câncer de próstata metastático sensível a hormônio ou localizado de alto risco

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. Methods An analytical decision model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy versus androgen deprivation therapy alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. The cost-effectiveness in metastatic patients with a high-volume disease was assessed separately. The model used data from randomized clinical trials and drug acquisition costs in Brazil. In addition, the costs of post-progression therapies have been included in this model. The benefits to health are expressed as the quality-adjusted life-years, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Results Chemohormonal therapy may be associated with improved quality-adjusted life-years for all patient. The improvement was more than six times greater for patients with high-volume metastatic disease. In these patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were up to 74% lower than the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of patients with non-metastatic disease. Conclusion Chemohormonal therapy has been more cost-effective in patients with high-volume metastatic disease.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a relação custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia hormonal em pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático sensível a hormônio ou localizado de alto risco. Métodos Um modelo de decisão analítico foi desenvolvido para determinar o custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia versus a monoterapia de privação de andrógeno para pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático hormônio-sensível e pacientes de alto risco com câncer de próstata não metastático. O custo-efetividade em pacientes metastáticos com um alto volume da doença foi verificado isoladamente. Os dados do modelo foram obtidos de ensaios clínicos randomizados utilizando custos de aquisição de medicamentos no Brasil. Os custos de terapias pós-progressão também foram incluídos no modelo. Os efeitos foram expressos em anos de vida ajustados por qualidade, e foram calculadas as razões de custo-efetividade incremental. Resultados A adição de quimioterapia levou a um ganho de anos de vida ajustados por qualidade para todos os doentes. Este incremento foi seis vezes maior para os pacientes com doença metastática de alto volume. Nestes pacientes, as taxas do custo incremental por anos de vida ajustados por qualidade foram até 74% mais baixos do que o aumento das taxas dos pacientes com doença não metastática. Conclusão A adição de quimioterapia foi mais custo-efetiva para pacientes com doença metastática de alto volume.

Economic evaluation of human albumin use in patients with nephrotic syndrome in four Brazilian public hospitals: pharmacoeconomic study / Avaliação econômica do uso de albumina humana em pacientes com síndrome nefrótica em quatro hospitais públicos brasileiros: estudo de farmacoeconomia

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: In 2004, the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, ANVISA) published a resolution establishing guidelines for albumin use. Although the published data do not indicate any definitive conclusions about the benefits of albumin use in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), the guidelines recommend this procedure only in cases of edema that is refractory to use of diuretics. The aim here was to analyze albumin use among patients with nephrotic syndrome. DESIGN AND SETTING: Pharmacoeconomic study conducted in four large public referral hospitals for nephrology services in northeastern Brazil. METHOD: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility economic evaluations were performed on a concurrent cohort of patients with nephrotic syndrome, who were divided into two groups according to compliance or noncompliance with the guidelines. Quality-of-life data were obtained from the SF36 and CHQ-PF50 questionnaires. RESULTS: This study enrolled 109 patients (60% adults and 56% women); 41.3% were using albumin in accordance with the guidelines. The weight, diuresis and fluid balance parameters were more cost-effective for patients who adhered to the guidelines. Regarding days of hospitalization avoided, the incremental ratio showed a daily cost of R$ 55.33, and guideline-compliant patients were hospitalized for five days or fewer. The quality of life improved by 8%, and savings of R$ 3,458.13/QALY (quality-adjusted life year) for the healthcare system were generated through guideline compliance. CONCLUSION: The economic analyses of this study demonstrated that there were greater cost benefits for patients whose treatment followed the guidelines.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Em 2004, a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) publicou uma resolução que estabelece diretrizes para o uso de albumina. Embora os dados publicados não indiquem conclusões definitivas sobre os benefícios do uso de albumina em pacientes com síndrome nefrótica (SN), a diretriz recomenda o procedimento apenas em casos de edema refratário ao uso de diuréticos. O objetivo aqui foi analisar o uso de albumina em pacientes com síndrome nefrótica. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo farmacoeconômico realizado em quatro grandes hospitais públicos de referência em serviços de nefrologia no nordeste do Brasil. MÉTODO: Foram realizadas avaliações econômicas do tipo custo-efetividade e custo-utilidade em uma coorte concorrente de pacientes com síndrome nefrótica, divididos em dois grupos de acordo com o cumprimento ou descumprimento das diretrizes. Dados de qualidade de vida foram obtidos a partir dos questionários SF36 e CHQ-PF50. RESULTADOS: Este estudo incluiu 109 pacientes (60% adultos e 56% mulheres); 41,3% estavam usando albumina conforme as diretrizes. Os parâmetros de peso, diurese e balanço hídrico foram mais custo-efetivos para pacientes que aderiram às diretrizes. Quanto a dias de internação evitados, a razão incremental mostrou um custo diário de R$ 55,33, sendo que os pacientes que seguiram as diretrizes ficaram cinco dias a menos internados. A qualidade de vida melhorou 8%, gerando economia de R$ 3,458.13/QALY (quality-adjusted life year) para o sistema de saúde por meio do cumprimento das diretrizes. CONCLUSÃO: As análises econômicas deste estudo demonstraram maiores benefícios em termos de custo para os pacientes cujo tratamento seguiu as diretrizes.

Pharmacoeconomical analysis of inhaled glucocorticosteroids in the treatment of children with cough variant asthma / 中国基层医药

Objective To discuss the clinical curative effect and pharmacoeconomics of inhaled glucocortico-steroids(ICS)in the treatment of children with cough variant asthma(CVA),in order to provide the reference for reasonable and economic drug -use of clinic treating children with CVA.Methods 128 children with CVA were divided into A,B,C three groups according to random number table method in our hospital from March 2013 to May 2014.The children with CVA of A,B,C groups were respectively given budesonide aerosol(200 -800μg/day,twice per day),fluticasone propionate aerosol(50 -100μg/time,twice per day),beclometasone dipropionate aerosol(50 -100μg/time,three times per day)on the basis of bronchodilator,smooth wheezing and expectorant.The clinical effica-cy and cost -effectiveness was evaluated after 12 weeks of treatment.Results The clinical total effective rates of A, B,C group were 90.0%,93.4%,90.7% respectively,and there were no statistically significant difference(χ2 =25.215,22.878,21.336,all P >0.05 ).The per capita cost of A,B,C group were 498.68yuan,671.20yuan, 541.14yuan respectively,and A group had the lowest cost -effectiveness ratio(C /E =5.54).Conclusion Budes-onide aerosol has better economy in treating of children with CVA.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of entecavir and lamivudine in treatment of early stage acute-on-chronic liver failure / 中国医师杂志

Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of entecavir and lamivudine in treatment of early stage acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF),and analyze the predictive factors.Methods Forty nine patients with early ACLF were enrolled.Of which,28 patients were treated with entecavir,and 21 patients were treated with lamivudine.Mortality,length of hospital stay,cost,liver function,coagulation function,and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were compared between two groups.Pharmacoeconomic evaluation was taken using cost-effectiveness analysis and cost minimization analysis.Results Mortality,length of hospital stay and cost had no significant difference between two groups.Ratio of costeffectiveness in lamivudine group was higher than that in entecavir group.Cox analysis showed that primary peritonitis and MELD score at the end of the second week were the main predictive factors.Conclusions Entecavir cannot improve the survival rate of early stage ACLF compared to lamivudine,but may provide economic benefit to patients with early stage ALCF.

Cost-minimization analysis of oral and intravenous administration of linezolid in a public hospital in southern Brazil / Análise de custo-minimização entre as vias de administração oral e endovenosa de linezolida em um hospital público da região sul do Brasil

Due to the paucity of cost-minimization studies about linezolid, the aim of this study was to estimate the cost differential between intravenous and oral administration. A retrospective cohort study and costminimization analysis was conducted between August 2009 and August 2013 in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Inpatient records were evaluated for 152 patients who received linezolid intravenously or orally. Over two-thirds of the patients (103, 67.8%) received the antibiotic by the intravenous route only (IV group), and the remainder received the antibiotic both routes sequentially (mixed group). In the IV group, 33 patients (31.7%) were eligible to receive the antibiotic orally. The total cost per patient (mean) after changing from intravenous to oral administration was significantly lower than the real cost paid per patient (mean) (p<0.001). The cost savings associated with switching to oral linezolid administration would be US$14,328.32 over four years. Pharmacoeconomic analyses of linezolid therapy can inform hospitals' decisions about the rational use of therapeutics and economic resources.

Devido à escassez de estudos de custo-minimização a cerca da linezolida, o objetivo deste estudo foi estimar a diferença de custo entre a administração intravenosa e oral desse antibiótico. Um estudo de coorte retrospectiva e uma análise de custo-minimização foram realizados entre agosto de 2009 e agosto de 2013, em um hospital público do sul do Brasil. Foram avaliados os prontuários médicos de 152 pacientes que receberam linezolida por via intravenosa e / ou oralmente. Mais de dois terços dos pacientes (103, 67.8%) receberam o medicamento exclusivamente por via intravenosa (grupo IV), e o restante (grupo misto) recebeu o antibacteriano por via intravenosa e por via oral sequencialmente. No grupo IV, 33 pacientes (31.7%) eram elegíveis para receber o antibiótico por via oral. O custo médio total por paciente após a troca hipotética da via de administração intravenosa para oral foi significativamente mais baixo do que o custo médio real pago por cada tratamento com linezolida (p <0.001). A economia de custos associados com a mudança para a administração oral de linezolida seria de US $ 14,328.32 ao longo de quatro anos. A análise farmacoeconômica da terapia com linezolida pode orientar as decisões dos hospitais quanto ao uso racional de terapêuticas e de recursos econômicos.

Farmacoeconomia: um instrumento para gestão em drogarias de bairro / Pharmacoeconomy: an instrument for the management of neighborhood drugstores

OBJETIVO: Analisar os conceitos básicos da FarE e sua possível utilização em drogarias de bairro para o incremento financeiro e competitividade destes estabelecimentos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo teórico dos conceitos básicos da FarE, e análise desta ferramenta para utilização em drogarias de bairro. O levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado através das bases de dados: Scielo, Lilacs, Ibecs, Medline e Google Acadêmico, com os descritores "farmacoeconomia", "economia da saúde" e "farmacoeconomia e drogarias", nos vernáculos inglês e português. Foram incluídos trabalhos sobre análise dos conceitos básicos e formas de análise, e trabalhos experimentais realizados no Brasil que utilizaram a FarE. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: A comercialização de medicamentos em drogarias alcançam cifras na ordem de bilhões, porém é observada a crescente abertura e interiorização de grandes redes, o que dificulta o mercado para as drogarias conhecidas como "drogarias de bairro". Como estes estabelecimentos geralmente dispõem de baixo capital e estoques, as análises de FarE podem orientar a compra de produtos mais eficazes, menos onerosos e permitem a redução do estoque, a fim de evitar a retenção de grande capital em produtos que não teriam fácil comercialização. Isto possibilitaria ainda uma melhor orientação aos pacientes, o que resulta provavelmente em uma maior fidelização dos mesmos. CONCLUSÃO: Pode-se concluir com este estudo através da análise dos conceitos básicos da FarE que esta ferramenta pode ser utilizada pelas drogarias de bairro para organização tanto financeira da compra e venda de produtos como a uma melhor assistência farmacêutica e fidelização de clientes

OBJECTIVE: to analyze the basic concepts of pharmacoeconomy (PharmE) and its possible use in neighborhood drugstores as a way of enhancing these establishments financially and competitively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a theoretical study on the basic concepts of PharmE and its use in neighborhood drugstores. Literature searches were performed on the databases: SciELO, Lilacs, IBECS, Medline and Google Scholar, using the keywords "pharmacoeconomics", "health economics" and "pharmacoeconomics and drugstores", in English and Portuguese. We included studies addressing basic definitions and analysis tools as well as experimental work carried out in Brazil using PharmE. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: the sale of medicines in drugstores accounts for billions. There has been an increasing establishment and internalization of big pharmacy chains, which makes difficult the market for drugstores known as "neighborhood drugstores". As these establishments generally have low capital and stock, analysis of PharmE can guide the purchase of more effective, less costly products. In addition, PharmE could drive the reduction of stocks in order to avoid large capital retention in products that would not have rapid commercialization. This would provide an even better orientation for patients, which probably results in increased loyalty. CONCLUSION: PharmE can be used by neighborhood drugstores for financial organization ­ purchase and sale of products ­ as well as for a better pharmaceutical care and customer loyalty

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for type 2 diabetes mellitus / 重庆医学

Objective To compare and analyze of three therapeutic schemes for type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM ) using the cost-effectiveness .Methods Using the basic idea of pharmacoeconomics evaluate cost-effect analysis method for three therapeutic schemes(oral glucose-lowering drugs ,oral glucose-lowering drugs + insulin injection one time ,oral glucose-lowering drugs + insu-lin injection twice) .Results The three therapeutic schemes average cost of arrived to 827 .30 yuan/3 months ,1 714 .50 yuan/3 months and 1 087 .50 yuan/3 months ,respectively(P=0 .00);the efficiency of control fasting blood glucose were 56 .51% ,51 .69%and 57 .04% ,respectively (P=0 .754);the efficiency of control 2 h postprandial blood glucose were 50 .56% ,40 .68% and 55 .63% , respectively (P=0 .097);the cost-effectiveness ratio of fasting blood glucose were 14 .64 ,33 .17 and 19 .06 ,respectively ;the cost-ef-fectiveness ratio of 2 h postprandial blood sugar were 16 .36 ,42 .15 and 19 .55 ,respectively .For the oral glucose-lowering drugs group as reference ,the cost-effective ratioscost of control fasting blood glucose and control 2 h postprandial blood glucose were -184 .4 and -89 .8 for oral glucose-lowering drugs + insulin injection one time ,respectively ;the cost-effective ratioscost of control fasting blood glucose and control 2 h postprandial blood glucose were 484 .8 and 51 .26 for oral glucose-lowering drugs + insulin in-jection twice ,respectively .Conclusion According to the principles of economics ,oral medication has the highest cost-effectiveness ratio in the treatment for T 2DM ,and oral medication + insulin injection twice has better therapeutic efficacy .

Evolución del consumo de medicamentos de alto costo en Colombia / Evolution of consumption of high-cost drugs in Colombia

Objective. Determine the patterns of consumption of high-cost drugs (HCD) during the 2005–2010 period in a population of Colombian patients enrolled in the General System of Social Security in Health. Methods. An observational descriptive study was conducted. The prescription dataof formulas of any drug considered to be high-cost dispensed to all users (1 674 517) in 20 cities of Colombia between 2005 and 2010 were analyzed. The anatomical therapeutic classification was considered, and the number of patients as well as monthly invoicing for each drug, the daily dose defined, and the cost per 1 000 inhabitants/day were defined. Results. Over the entire study period, the amount invoiced for HCDs increased by 847.4%. Antineoplastic and immunomodulator drugs accounted for 46.3% of the totalinvoicing. The other drugs were anti-infectives (15.2%), systemic hormonal preparations (9.5%), and drugs for the nervous system (9.1%). Most of these drugs were prescribed at the daily doses defined as recommended by the World Health Organization, but with high costs per 1 000 inhabitants/day. Conclusions. In Colombia a crisis has occurred in recent years due to the high spending generated by the most expensive drugs. The progressive growth of pharmaceutical spending is greater than the increased coverage by the country’s health system. The Colombian health system should evaluate how much it is willing to pay for the most expensive drugs for some diseases and what strategies should be implemented to cover these expenses and thus guarantee access to the insured.

Objetivo. Determinar el comportamiento del consumo de medicamentos de alto costo (MAC) durante 2005–2010 en una población de pacientes colombianos afiliados al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo observacional; se analizaron datos de prescripción de fórmulas dispensadas desde 2005 a 2010 a todos los usuarios (1 674 517) de algún medicamento considerado de alto costo en 20 ciudades de Colombia. Se consideró la clasificación anatómicaterapéutica y el número de pacientes, así como la facturación mensual por cada medicamento, la dosis diaria definida y el costo por 1 000 habitantes/día. Resultados. En todo el período de estudio, el valor facturado por MAC creció 847,4%. Losantineoplásicos e inmunomoduladores constituyeron 46,3% del total facturado, antinfecciosos 15,2%, preparaciones hormonales sistémicas 9,5% y fármacos para el sistema nervioso 9,1%. La mayoría de estos medicamentos fueron prescritos a las dosis diarias definidas recomendadaspor la Organización Mundial de Salud, pero con altos costos por 1 000 habitantes y día. Conclusiones. En Colombia durante los últimos años se ha presentado una crisis debida al elevado gasto generado por los medicamentos más costosos. El crecimiento progresivo del gasto farmacéutico es mayor que el aumento de la cobertura del sistema sanitario del país. El sistema sanitario colombiano debe evaluar cuánto está dispuesto a pagar por los medicamentosmás costosos para algunas morbilidades y qué estrategias debe implementar para sufragar estos gastos y así garantizar el acceso a los asegurados.

El análisis de impacto presupuestario en salud: puesta al día con un modelo de abordaje genérico / Budgetary impact analysis in health: update with a model using a generic approach

El Análisis de Impacto Presupuestario (AIP) en el campo de la salud puede ser definido como la estimación de los costos financieros netos que le representarían a una institución dar cobertura a una determinada intervención. En la práctica, los AIP se utilizan frecuentemente para decidir la inclusión o exclusión de medicamentos en formularios terapéuticos y notoriamente han obligado a reconocer que las Evaluaciones Económicas representan una mirada parcial en el análisis de las consecuencias de la incorporación de tecnologías sanitarias. Este trabajo procura identificar los determinantes y componentes de los análisis de impacto presupuestario, y a partir de ello describir el desarrollo de un modelo creado en una planilla de cálculo que permite considerar cualquier tecnología sanitaria y obtener estimaciones con diferentes grados de complejidad. Su diseño incorpora de forma explícita las habilidades del usuario y las deficiencias de información, buscando a su vez promover el desarrollo de estas herramientas en los ámbitos de gestión de nuestros países.

Budgetary Impact Analysis (BIA) applied to health care can be defined as the estimate of the net financial costs that a given intervention would represent for a health care institution given the case it was covered. Routinely, BIAs are used to decide the inclusion or exclusion of drugs in therapeutic schemes; actually, the increased use of BIAs have raised awareness about the fact that health economic evaluations represent a partial view in the analysis of the consequences of incorporating health technologies. This paper seeks to identify the determinants and components of BIA, and to describe the development of a spreadsheet model that enables us to assess the Budget impact of any health technology and perform estimations with differing degrees of complexity. Its design explicitly adapts to the user skills and gaps in information, thus seeking to promote the development of these tools in the management fields in our countries.

SUGAMADEX: novos horizontes para a reversão do bloqueio neuromuscular / SUGAMMADEX: new horizons for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade

O sugamadex é uma droga nova e revolucionária desenvolvida como antagonista seletivo dos agentes bloqueadores neuromusculares (ABNM) esteroides (rocurônio > vecurônio ¼ pancurônio). O medicamento é uma y-ciclodextrina modificada e hidrossolúvel que forma um composto estável com o ABNM na razão de 1:1. Ele se liga ao ABNM livre no plasma, criando um gradiente de concentração que desloca o ABNM dos receptores nicotínicos na junção neuromuscular, levando à reversão completa e duradoura do BNM. O sugamadex não se liga às proteínas ou a qualquer outro receptor no organismo, o que lhe confere ótimo perfil de tolerância. O sugamadex pode ser usado na reversão do BNM profundo, promovendo recuperação mais rápida em relação à succinilcolina. Seu emprego pode diminuir a necessidade de monitorização do BNM, a incidência de bloqueio residual e ainda evitar os efeitos adversos causados pelos anticolinesterásicos e anticolinérgicos. Entretanto, também há limitações em relação à utilização 00 sugamadex. Ele impede o uso dos AB- NMs esteroides durante 24 horas, caso seja necessário novo BNM, e pode aumentar o risco do emprego desnecessário e indiscriminado dos ABNMs. Além disso, faltam dados da sua utilização em alguns grupos populacionais e de seu uso em larga escala. Por fim, deve-se considerar também o fator econômico, visto que se trata de uma droga nova e de valor ainda elevado no mercado...

Sugammadex is a novel and unique compaund designed as a selective antaganist ot steroidal neuromuscular blaeking agents (NMBA) (rocuronium>vecuronium¼pancuronium). The drug is a modified water-saluble y-cyclodextrin that forms a stable complex at a 1:1 ratio with the NMBA. It combines with the NMBA creating a concentration gradient favoring the movement ot the NMBA from the nicotine receptors ot the neuromuscular junction leading to the complete and lasting reversal af the neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Sugamadex does not bind to plasma proteins or any other receptors system in the body what provides him a great tolerance profile. Sugamadex can be used in the reversal af deep neuromuscular blockade with a faster recovery time in relation to succinylcholine. Its use can diminish the necessity af monitoring af the NMB, the incidence ot residual blockade and still prevent the adverse effects caused by the antiecholinesterase and anticholinergic drugs. However, there are limitatians regarding the use af Sugammadex. It hinders the use ot the steroidal NMBA during 24 hours if a new NMB must be restablished and it can increase the risk ot unnecessary and indiscriminate use af the NMBA. Mareaver, there is a laek ot data regarding the its use in some population groups and in large scale. Final/y, the economic factor must be also considered, since it is a new drug with a still raised value in market...